Wednesday, April 11, 2018

News for CougGroup 4/11/2018


Easop Winston has become Washington State’s most consistent spring receiver

UPDATED: Tue., April 10, 2018, 10:39 p.m.

Spokesman-Review/ By Theo Lawson

PULLMAN – Easop Winston’s height isn’t a restraint, but you’ll find outside wide receivers on Washington State’s roster much more willowy than the 5-foot-11 redshirt junior.

Winston’s foot speed, although not a setback, isn’t something that distinguishes the junior college transfer from the other pass-catchers vying for repetitions in Pullman this spring.

Nor is Winston winning his one-on-one duels with defensive backs by exerting supreme strength at the point of contact. But he’s still winning them.

The Cougars are through nine practices of 2018 spring camp and you’d only be able to pick out a handful in which the City College of San Francisco transfer hasn’t been the most productive wide receiver. The second-year player is firmly entrenched in WSU’s wideout rotation – comprised of eight players, two at each position (X, H, Y and Z) – and should be one solution on the outside for a team that needs to replace the 130 balls caught last season by Tavares Martin Jr. and Isaiah Johnson-Mack.

“I’m very impressed with him. I like everything he does. I like his personality, I like his tempo,” first-year outside receivers coach Steve Spurrier Jr. said. “… He’s a guy that’ll definitely play and play a lot of snaps. He does a lot of really good job for us offensively.”

The fact that Winston redshirted after joining the Cougars as a JC transfer makes him a rare breed of college football player.

Junior college players are often brought to Division I programs for the sole purpose of contributing right away, generally because of the physical maturity they have over high school recruits and/or because they pick up new material at a quicker rate.

Winston had much of the package put together when he got to WSU last spring and he immediately drew a ringing endorsement from standout quarterback Luke Falk, who said the WR possessed the “softest hands” of any player he’d thrown to. But he was never in peak physical shape and therefore Winston wound up beneath a pile of young inside receivers who came along faster than most expected them to.

“It was a little tough, but at the end of the day I know God has a plan for me,” Winston said after a rain-soaked Tuesday practice at Martin Stadium. “I just took it and ran with it. Just got better and really tried to perfect my craft last year, and this year I can see that what I worked on last year is definitely showing itself and evident to me on the field.”

Winston, who’d make the switch from inside to outside receiver, finally got in shape. But he didn’t instantly become one of WSU’s top practice players by acquiring top-end speed or sprouting 5 inches between years one and two in Pullman.

He found another way to stand out in head coach Mike Leach’s Air Raid offense.

“Easop’s gotten where he’s kind of explosive out there and he gets a lot of mop-up balls,” Leach said. “If a play breaks down or something or if he’s not the first read, he keeps working, so he finds his way into a lot of balls and I think when you develop that kind of reliability, then the quarterbacks find you and they’ll look for you if they get in a bind.”

In one instance during Tuesday’s live team period, quarterback Anthony Gordon shook off his first read, escaped a congested pocket and found Winston on the run. The receiver stuck the ball near the sideline, juked safety Deion Singleton and shifted away from Dylan Axelson, sprinting into the end zone to complete a 55-yard touchdown.

Winston’s “after-the-fact production,” as Leach terms it, has allowed him to accumulate more spring touchdowns than any other WSU receiver. Slot receiver Kyle Sweet is a close second, both in touchdown production and consistency.

“Something will break down and (Winston) keeps going and he keeps going and he’ll get a ball,” Leach said.

The receiver credits that to his “love of the game.” But maybe it’s because he has a selfish side, too.

“I just want the ball in my hand at all times,” Winston said, “so if a play ever breaks down, I’m usually that guy trying to run around, waving my hand, throwing the mail up, trying to get any ball I can out there.

Winston has been the preferred safety net for each of WSU’s quarterbacks this spring, but he has a special rapport with Gordon, a former teammate at City College of San Francisco. They made up one of the most dangerous tag teams in the Bay 6 League during the 2015 season. Gordon threw for 3,864 passing yards and 37 touchdowns. Winston caught 62 passes for 986 yards and 12 touchdowns.

That chemistry didn’t dissipate when both players moved their college careers from the Bay Area to the Palouse.

“He’ll give me a look and I’ll kind of know what he wants and that’s definitely been great for us, too, being able to come here and still have that connection that we built at City,” Winston said.

“That was my go-to guy at our junior college our one year,” Gordon said. “Me and him, we have a little connection going. We give each other a little look or something, kind of can read each others’ minds a little bit, I guess.”

………

Pac-12 Networks: Media industry report shows steep drop in subscriber fees (but don’t hit the panic button just yet)

By JON WILNER
San Jose Mercury News

PUBLISHED: April 10, 2018 at 8:57 am | UPDATED: April 11, 2018 at 7:32 am

Every so often, we’re able to remove the shroud from the Pac-12 Networks and examine the conference’s wholly-owned, controversial, hugely-expensive, modestly-successful media enterprise.

The last such instance came in September, when the Hotline acquired closely-guarded TV ratings that showed Olympic sports broadcasts — the object of so much network investment — were watched by friends and families and very few others.

Well, another morsel of information has surfaced to help fill in one pixel of the Pac-12 Networks’ financial screen.

It comes in the form of a report by SNL Kagan, the highly-respected media research firm that has been tracking audience data for a half-century.

The report, obtained by the Hotline from a source (and published below), lists the average subscriber fee for dozens of national sports networks — from ESPN to the World Fishing Network, from the SEC Network to the Outdoor Channel.

The numbers are hardly flattering for the Pac-12, but the issue is complicated and requires extensive context.

Kagan’s research shows that, in addition to its well-documented limited reach (i.e., households), the Pac-12 National network generates a dramatically lower average subscriber fee than the SEC and Big Ten networks.

Perhaps more surprising is that the Pac-12 National’s subscriber fee has dropped over the years — and not by a few cents, either.

It has plunged.

According to Kagan, the Pac-12 National network received an average of $0.30 per subscriber (coast-to-coast) when it was launched in 2012.

That number accounts for the higher fees paid by subscribers inside the conference’s home markets and the lower fees paid by out-of-market subscribers (i.e., viewers from Topeka to Bangor to Miami).

To be clear: That tiered fee structure is standard practice for college networks. The SEC’s subscriber fees are higher in Birmingham than Billings; the Big Ten doesn’t command the same fee in Albuquerque as it does in Ann Arbor.

But here’s where the situation gets interesting.

Kagan’s research listed the average national subscriber fee in five-year increments:

* In 2012, the Big Ten commanded $0.37 per sub, while the Pac-12 National network received $0.30.

* By 2017, the Big Ten’s average sub fee had jumped to $0.48, an increase of 30 percent, while the Pac-12 fee had dropped to $0.11.

That’s right: From $0.30 to $0.11 in the five-year span.

Of the 24 networks listed in the research report that existed in both 2012 and 2017, the Pac-12 Network was one of only four that experienced a drop in sub fees over the span. The others were the Olympic Channel, the Tennis Channel and beIN Sports.

The Pac-12’s fee decrease was, by far, the largest.

On the surface, that would be cause for panic in the athletic departments and presidents’ offices across the conference. But as noted at the top, the situation requires a bit of context, and into that realm we shall dive …

After obtaining the Kagan report, I asked the Pac-12 for an explanation. The response came in the form of a statement:

“We do not comment on the details of our distribution arrangements, but we can tell you that our contracted rates increase annually, as is common in the industry, and these reported estimates are not an accurate reflection of our economics.”

I then went back to Kagan, whose research is used throughout the media and entertainment industries, and asked for a response to the Pac-12’s response.

Not surprisingly, Kagan stood by its research.


After digging into the numbers and discussing the situation with numerous sources, I determined that both sides could very well be right.

How could that be?

First, let’s parse the Pac-12 statement (italics are mine):

“We do not comment on the details of our distribution arrangements, but we can tell you that our contracted rates increase annually, as is common in the industry, and these reported estimates are not an accurate reflection of our economics.”

*** Our contracted rates:

Kagan isn’t reporting the terms of the Pac-12 Networks’ carriage contracts. It’s reporting the average fee for subscribers across the country.

I have no reason to doubt the conference on the matter of its rate increases with, for example, Comcast or Cox:

An uptick of three or four percent annually is industry standard.

But the average fee for subscribers coast-to-coast depends, to a certain extent, on the breakdown of the audience:

Increase the number of subscribers paying the lower out-of-market rate, and the average fee drops.

*** Not an accurate reflection of our economics:

The conference isn’t disputing the specific Kagan estimates, it’s pivoting to the macro level.

And here again, I would agree. The economics are better than the plunging sub fees indicate.

The Pac-12 Networks are stable at worst and growing, slowly but steadily, at best:

— The number of subscribers has increase significantly, from about 12 million soon after launch to the current tally of 19 million (Kagan’s estimate).

— Moreover, the networks are expected to distribute $2.75 million to the campuses (approximately) in fiscal year 2018.

So how do we account for the apparent contradictions, for the contract increases and the lower fees, for the added eyeballs and stable economics?

In the fall of 2016, Dish Network expanded its agreement with the Pac-12 and moved the National network from a sports tier to a more accessible basic tier.

(The arrangement came soon after the Pac-12 struck a deal with Sling, which is owned by Dish.)

By moving to Dish’s basic tier, the Pac-12 Networks added 4.5 million out-of-market subscribers, according to Kagan.

Millions more out-of-market subs paying a much lower rate — estimated to be $0.05, which is standard — had the effect of lowering the average subscriber fee.

Just as Kagan reported.

In one regard, it seems, the development is encouraging for the conference: The National network gained eyeballs.

“They took lower revenue in order to reach more homes,” said Adam Gajo, a Kagan analyst who covers regional sports networks.

That piece, admittedly, is a tad fuzzy:

Did the conference drop its out-of-market rate (to $0.05 per sub) in exchange for moving to a more widely-accessible tier on Dish?

Did it drop the out-of-market rate in response to another development?

Did it drop the rate at all?

(Changing the rate for Dish would force the networks to change the rates for all distributors, according to the terms of its carriage agreements.)

Kagan believes the rate drop is exactly what happened:

With millions of out-of-market subscribers added to the audience pool, and with the lowering of out-of-market rate, the average sub fee plunged from $0.30 to the estimated $0.11.

(If there was an out-of-market change in the new or revised contracts, then the conference’s claim that its contracted rates include annual increases could still hold true: There could be increases in the revamped deals.)

Details aside, the Kagan estimates show just how far the Pac-12 Networks lag behind their peers at the SEC and Big Ten in subscriber fees and, in a larger sense, how the conference might have overreached its audience in creating six regional networks in addition to Pac-12 National.

What if the Kagan numbers are wrong?

Well, we should assume less than 100 percent accuracy, because 1) Kagan doesn’t have access to the contracts and 2) the fees are presented as estimates by Kagan itself.

But how wrong could the estimates be? Could the drop only be to $0.25 … or to $0.20?

Is it really all the way down to the $0.11 range.

“Kagan takes great pride in their accuracy,” an industry source told the Hotline. “I’m certain they would not have published a rate with such a dramatic swing if they weren’t comfortable with it.

“It’s not good for their business to miss that badly.”

The source added that fee estimates typically bring a margin-for-error of five to seven percent — and that margin increases for college sports networks because of the complication caused by the tiered fee structure (i.e., Ann Arbor vs. Albuquerque).

But let’s view this hypothetically:

Even if Kagan’s estimates for Pac-12 National are off by 25 percent — a complete whiff — the network would still be generating an average of just $0.14 per sub.

That’s in line with the Tennis Channel and the World Fishing Network but nowhere close to the Big Ten or SEC networks.

To reiterate: The fee drop doesn’t mean the Pac-12 Networks are cratering.

They aren’t.

But the Kagan estimates are more evidence of a lagging business … another nugget to help fill in the pixels … to help us gain a slightly better understanding of the finances.

After all, the Pac-12 Networks are a nine-figure annual enterprise owned by 10 public (and two private) universities.

Pulling back the shroud, whenever the opportunity arises, is important.


………
New potential downtown Pullman development sites and Welcome Park construction revealed by Mayor Johnson

April 10, 2018 Pullman Radio News

Potential new developments for downtown Pullman were revealed during Mayor Glenn Johnson’s annual State of the City Address Tuesday.

Johnson says he has heard from the owner of the old Audian Theatre and the former Basilio’s space about possible projects for those sites.  That same property owner has also expressed interest in purchasing the Moose Lodge for a potential development. 

Mayor Johnson also stated that the new downtown Subway will be expanded.  The sandwich restaurant was heavily damaged in an arson fire last year.  The new Subway will include the space next door which used to house a barber shop.  These discussions come as construction continues on the large mixed use downtown development called Evolve on Main.

Johnson also announced that the long planned for welcome park on Davis Way will be constructed this Summer.  Additional private donations have been secured to pay for the project.  The park will include a welcome sign in 60 different languages.  Johnson hopes the park will be done in time for this Fall’s Washington State University football home opener.    


:::::::::::

Mayor talks bonds, downtown development

Officials praise projects, hint at improvements yet to come during State of the City Address

Moscow Pullman Daily News Apr 11, 2018

With a bevy of projects scheduled for 2018 and hints of development yet to come, Pullman Mayor Glenn Johnson's Tuesday State of City Address portrayed a city poised to enter a new era.

With Evolve on Main's large mixed-use facility due for completion this fall, Johnson said the atmosphere on Pullman's Main Street is about to change radically.

"It's going to be transformational, it really is," Johnson said. "When you have something like this come to downtown Pullman - it's going to bring apartments, about 85, plus retail on the bottom floor - things are going to start happening."

Johnson said he has heard rumblings a Spokane family who owns some of Pullman's downtown real estate, including the old Audian Theater, is interested in investing in revitalization.

"I'm just going to say there are really solid prospects that may happen downtown," Johnson said. "I can't talk about exactly what they are right now, but, let me tell you, it's very positive."

Johnson said the family in question reached out to Evolve on Main and is considering potential projects. For example, Johnson said they also looked into purchasing and renovating Pullman's Moose Lodge.

"That's the exciting thing that's going on right now," Johnson said. "We know people that are actually wanting to do something to help downtown."

Early in the address, Johnson thanked Pullman voters who supported a pair of bond propositions presented on the February ballot.

"We had full support in November and we had even more support in February," Johnson said.

Proposition No. 1 - a 20-year bond for up to $10.5 million - allowed the city to purchase a new city hall and recreation facility; Proposition No. 2 - a 10-year, $2.4 million replacement bond - will fund upgrades for parks and paths throughout the city.

The bonds appeared to have initially passed in November, but they were placed on the ballot once again in February after county officials expressed doubt about all conditions for passage being met.

The first proposition funded the purchase and conversion of the Encounter Ministries campus, located at 190 SE Crestview St., into a new city hall, senior center and recreation center.

Johnson called the purchase a "fantastic acquisition," saying the new space will bring much needed improvement and expansion to current city facilities.

That proposition will also purchase property for Pullman's third fire station and fund construction of an event center at Lawson Gardens.

Recreation Superintendent Kurt Dahmen said the new recreation facility will be a huge benefit to the community.

"It's something that's been in the works for probably 20 to 25 years," Dahmen said. "We've kept it on the radar screen, and this property presented a unique opportunity."

Johnson also praised the wide-ranging collaborative effort that made the Pullman-Moscow Regional Airport Runway Realignment project a reality.

Pullman's final contribution to the project has been made, Johnson said, and the airport is expected to become fully operational by October of next year.

Johnson said he is encouraged by what is happening in his city.

"Most of you can feel the energy that's in this community right now - it is really spectacular," Johnson said.

#

Pullman to Boise flights possible

Airport director, Moscow Councilor Bettge agree there is a strong demand

Moscow Pullman Daily News April 11, 2018

Pullman-Moscow Regional Airport Executive Director Tony Bean and Moscow City Councilors see the importance of Pullman to Boise flights, but whether the idea will take flight is still up in the air.

Bean said he is scheduled to meet with Alaska Airlines officials early next month, and services to Boise will be one of the topics discussed. He said the airport touches base with its lone carrier around this time of year, and adding Boise flights is always a discussion point.

Some Idaho residents want Horizon Air to keep its flight service to Seattle and Boise at Lewiston-Nez Perce County Regional Airport after Alaska Airlines, parent company of Horizon Air, announced two weeks ago it will end the flights on Aug. 25, The Associated Press reported. The move will leave SkyWest's Salt Lake City flights as the only service in Lewiston.

Bean said there is a need to add Boise flights at the Pullman airport.

"The largest state employer in northern Idaho is the University of Idaho, and the connectivity for them to get to Boise is very important," Bean said.

Moscow City Councilor Art Bettge said he and other Moscow councilors would like to see Pullman to Boise services.

He said the majority of passengers on Lewiston to Boise flights are from the Moscow area.

"Clearly, an airline has somewhat limited resources to be able to provide flights to everywhere for everyone, but I think this is a flight that needs to connect North Idaho with South Idaho," Bettge said.

Starting later this year, passengers flying from Pullman to Boise will need to fly to Seattle first, taking more time and causing a larger inconvenience, Bettge said.

He said Pullman to Boise flights could attract passengers from Lewiston to Coeur d'Alene.

Bean said he will let Alaska Airlines know the significant need to connect Palouse residents to Boise and see if there are available options to do so. Ultimately, the airline makes those decisions, Bean said.

Currently, Alaska Airlines only provides service to Seattle from the Pullman airport, Bean said. He said the airline provides four flights per day to and from Seattle during the school year. Bean said the airline has dropped down to three flights a day the last couple years during the summer.

He said the airport is not trying to add more airline carriers at this time due to the existing runway configuration and runway realignment construction taking place.

Bean said planes are expected to be able to operate on the new runway starting Oct. 10, 2019.

When the runway project nears completion, Bean said more discussions will be had about adding more carriers to the airport.

"In 2019, when the runway opens, that might be a different conversation," Bean said, "but with the existing runway, it's difficult on carriers without certain technologies to be able to get in here."

Bean said contractors turned in construction bids Tuesday for completion of runway construction. He said he estimates a bid will be awarded at the next airport board meeting April 25.

#