Sunday, December 8, 2019

News for CougGroup 12/8/2019


News for CougGroup 12/8/2019

Basketball: No. 24 Gonzaga women beat Washington State 76-53

Dec 9, 2018 Associated Press

SPOKANE, Wash. -- LeeAnne Wirth scored 12 points, on 6-of-7 shooting, to lead six Gonzaga players in double figures and the No. 24 Bulldogs beat Washington State 76-53 on Sunday.

Jill Townsend and Katie Campbell each had 11 points and Laura Stockton, Zykera Rice and Chandler Smith scored 10 apiece for Gonzaga. The Bulldogs (9-1), who are off to the best start in program history, have won three in a row against WSU and five straight overall.

Wirth made a layup and Rice hit a jumper to make it 21-17 and Gonzaga led the rest of the way. Maria Kostourkova's layup with 3:14 left in the second quarter pulled the Cougars to 25-24 but they missed their next six field-goal attempts and committed six turnovers while going scoreless for the next 7 1/2 minutes. Six different GU players scored during a 15-0 run that made it 40-24 midway through the third and WSU trailed by double figures from there.

Borislava Hristova led Washington State (4-5) with 19 points and Kostourkova scored 10. Those two combined to made 11 of 19 from the field while the rest of the Cougars were just 9-of-31 (29 percent) shooting.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

MEN BASKETBALL

Not Cougs of years past

WSU’s revamped defense stifles NCAA tournament mainstay New Mexico State

By COLTON CLARK OF Lewiston TRiB Dec 8, 2019

SPOKANE — The Washington State of last year wouldn’t have been so resolute.

In fact, that Cougars men’s basketball team lost to NCAA tournament mainstay New Mexico State twice.

Last year’s WSU didn’t emphasize defense as much as this one does under first-year coach Kyle Smith, who just earned himself somewhat of a signature win by way of his signature style.

Wazzu, which has transitioned into a defensive-minded group with Smith at the helm, upended the notable mid-major Aggies 63-54 on Saturday at Spokane Arena, employing to great effect their fresh methodology: lockdown defense — a quick-switching, shot-contesting, turnover-forcing shield — to stymie pesky NMSU in spurts and hold off an Aggie rally down the stretch.

“I can’t think of anyone that didn’t have a great defensive effort,” said Smith, whose team improved to 5-4. “By far our best effort (of the year).”

As it has been so far this season, the Cougs’ offense was inconsistent, steady over short periods but sluggish enough to permit NMSU runs of its own, which trimmed three separate double-digit Wazzu leads to single possessions.

Sophomore forward CJ Elleby represented WSU’s lone double-digit scorer. He poured in 20, nine of those coming on a solo spree to begin the second half and help push the Cougars’ lead to as much as 14.

Then came another of the many lulls for a team that shot 17-of-48.

“We have a tendency to kinda take quick shots in the shot clock, and when we do that, it sets the other team up for transition,” said Elleby, who also grabbed seven rebounds. “When we buckle down, we slow down our offense, we swing it side to side. Coach harps on it a lot — get it up and across the floor.”

WSU’s offense had its ebbs and flows. Its defense didn’t fluctuate. Open Aggie looks were seldom. So too was separation at the perimeter. The Cougs led for 36 minutes.

NMSU (5-5), which has made the national tournament three consecutive years and eight times since 2010, shot 34 percent from the floor and 18 percent on 3-pointers, which it prefers.

It coughed it up 17 times and couldn’t muster as much offense as Wazzu, particularly in the final three minutes, when the game was within the Aggies’ grasp.

“It wasn’t pretty — we lost our balance there a little bit — but we stumbled into it, and got tougher and made our free throws,” Smith said. “You could tell we were getting a little tight.

“I’ve done this enough. You gotta fight through it, play through it, and they did a good job of that.”

The Cougars, who had 13 giveaways, were buoyed in the last 10 minutes by senior forward Jeff Pollard, who flipped in a few clutch layins and kept NMSU off the glass to thwart a run. The Aggies cut it to 53-49 with 3:20 on the clock, but WSU kept responding.

Pollard, who described himself as doing “the dirty work,” had nine points and a career-high 10 rebounds.

“They went on a late run and it was more just refocusing the team and getting back to what had gotten us the lead,” Pollard said, “and that was defending and rebounding, which slipped when they got going.”

Elleby, who Smith said has matured from “Robin” last year to “Batman” this season, astutely chose his fights and earned chances at the free-throw line, where he went 10-of-13.

“You don’t always necessarily fight fire with fire — you just pick the spots,” said Smith, who challenged Elleby in the preseason to make his way to the foul line more. “They couldn’t keep him in front of them.”

Said Elleby, a top-five scorer in the Pac-12: “I knew I had to be a little more aggressive and get to the rim” because the Cougars’ hit-and-miss deep-ball and mid-range offense had provided Aggie retorts.

Elleby broke open an offensive standstill when he rose up in NMSU’s key and swiped a pass midway through the first half, then lobbed it deep to free-running Noah Williams, who flipped it in. Elleby then canned a 3, sparking WSU’s offense to an 11-0 run that furnished a nine-point halftime lead.

Wazzu canned seven 3s in the first half, one being the first of emerging forward Tony Miller's career. Miller supplied a lift off the bench from start to finish, scoring nine points and collecting five boards.

The Cougs, headed by the versatile play of Elleby, sprinted out to a 14-point edge four minutes into the second, but committed three consecutive turnovers soon after and let the Aggies hang around — and even cut it to 41-39 at 11:30.

But WSU’s signature defense prevailed, blanking NMSU for just more than four minutes and enabling a 12-2 burst from its offense, enough to survive another scoring deficiency at the end.

“Just take away the 3 and survive on the glass, barely,” Smith said.

For NMSU, Trevelin Queen and Jabari Rice combined for 28 points and 16 rebounds, but were overall the team’s only bright spots.

These might not exactly be the dominant Western Athletic Conference Aggies of years past, but it’s still the top win of Smith’s first season. It’s also proof these aren’t the Cougars of years past.

“That DNA is strong. They were a possession away from beating Auburn (in the tournament),” Smith said. “A lot of those guys out there were in that game last year, and that says a lot for us.”

NEW MEXICO ST. (5-5)

Bobbitt 2-3 1-2 6, Aurrecoechea 4-7 0-1 8, Buchanan 1-5 0-0 3, Queen 6-19 0-0 14, T.Brown 0-6 0-0 0, McCants 1-4 2-6 4, McNair 0-0 0-0 0, R.Brown 0-0 2-2 2, S.Williams 1-5 0-0 3, Rice 6-12 2-3 14. Totals 21-61 7-14 54.

WASHINGTON ST. (5-4)

Elleby 4-8 10-13 20, Kunc 2-5 0-0 6, Pollard 4-10 1-3 9, Robinson 0-5 0-0 0, Shead 1-4 2-2 5, Miller 3-4 2-2 9, Cannon 1-3 4-4 7, Bonton 1-5 0-0 3, N.Williams 1-4 2-2 4. Totals 17-48 21-26 63.

Halftime — Washington St., 30-21. 3-point goals — New Mexico St. 5-28 (Queen 2-8, Bobbitt 1-2, Buchanan 1-3, S.Williams 1-3, Aurrecoechea 0-1, McCants 0-2, Rice 0-4, T.Brown 0-5), Washington St. 8-21 (Kunc 2-4, Elleby 2-6, Miller 1-1, Cannon 1-2, Shead 1-2, Bonton 1-3, Robinson 0-1, N.Williams 0-1, Pollard 0-1). Fouled out — None. Rebounds — New Mexico St. 39 (Rice 9), Washington St. 35 (Pollard 10). Assists — New Mexico St. 13 (Buchanan 4), Washington St. 11 (Robinson 4). Total fouls — New Mexico St. 22, Washington St. 20. A — 1,222.

::::

WSU football

High-powered offenses with contrasting styles set to meet when Washington State takes on Air Force in Cheez-It Bowl

By Theo Lawson Trib of Lewiston 12/8/2019

CHEEZ-IT BOWL

At Chase Field, Phoenix

Friday, Dec. 27: Air Force Falcons at Washington State Cougars, 7:15 p.m. PDT TV: ESPN

When Cheez-It Bowl public relations director Scott Leightman introduced the teams participating in this year’s Arizona showcase during a teleconference Sunday afternoon, he teased an “offensive explosion” between Washington State and No. 24 Air Force, who each enter the postseason averaging more than 34 points per contest and should give the other plenty to think about as bowl prep takes place over the next three weeks.

Of course, standards aren’t too high for a bowl game that produced just two touchdowns and 17 points when Cal and TCU met at Phoenix’s Chase Field last year. There were more interceptions (9) than Cal points (7) in TCU’s narrow victory and both teams finished the game with backup quarterbacks behind center.

Nonetheless, the 2019 game, scheduled for Dec. 27 at 7:15 p.m. PT (ESPN), should be a refresher for anyone still waiting to get their offensive fix.

The Cougars and Falcons have no problem getting into the end zone, but while the Cheez-It Bowl may be an offensive marathon between teams that respectively rank 11th and tied for 22nd nationally in points per game, it’ll also be an appropriate example of the old adage that there’s more than one way to skin a cat.

In Pullman, Mike Leach is known for his simple but potent Air Raid schemes, which have produced the nation’s past two passing leaders in Anthony Gordon and Gardner Minshew. The Cougars have thrown for 5,332 yards this season – 303 more than second-place LSU, even though the Tigers have played one more game.

In Colorado Springs, Troy Calhoun has shown the same dogged determination and unwavering attitude toward the triple option, a run-first scheme that often forces the defense to focus on three ball-carriers on a single play. The Falcons have attempted just 114 passes this season – second-fewest in the country – but they’ve rushed for 37 touchdowns and rank third in the country at 292.7 yards per game.

So, while Leach and Calhoun may never swap playbooks, the coaches have plenty of mutual respect for the other’s strategy.

“Other than this bowl game, being American and everything, I always rooted for Air Force,” Leach said. “But the opportunity to play a great rushing team like them, an option team, we’re excited about that.”

Despite the stark contrasts in how the Cougars and Falcons move the football, Leach actually believes they draw on similar concepts, both striving to distribute offensive touches evenly.

“If I didn’t throw the ball, I’d run the option,” Leach said, “and why I admire the option is I always felt like our brand of football really kind of started with the wishbone, because what the wishbone always did such a good job of is distribution. All the skill positions touch the ball and it’s pretty good at stretching the field from side to side.”

Calhoun, the longtime Air Force coach, has plenty of background knowledge when it comes to the Cougars, and he’s spent decades following Leach’s career, crediting the offensive guru for his work at Oklahoma in 1999 as an offensive coordinator.

“Oh goodness, what a challenge it is,” Calhoun said. “And it’s been that way ever since really … Mike, he’s just done a sensational job even going back at Kentucky, even prior to that. He’s just been incredible. He’s the one that truly launched Oklahoma back into such a prominent program and the job he did at both Texas Tech and certainly just an amazing job he’s done at Washington State.

“The production, the quality of their execution and really the difficulty in trying to assimilate what they do. It is going to be a gigantic challenge.”

The Cheez-It Bowl will mark the first meeting between the Pac-12 Cougars (6-6, 3-6) and the Mountain West Falcons (10-2, 7-1). Air Force carries a seven-game win streak into the postseason while WSU is coming off a 31-13 loss to Washington in the Apple Cup.

WSU has played in the bowl game once before, and so has Leach, but the appearances were separated by 14 years. The Cougars’ only trip to the Cheez-It Bowl, then named the Copper Bowl, came in 1992 when WSU beat Utah 31-28 in Tucson, Arizona.

In Drew Bledsoe’s final game as a collegian, the WSU quarterback completed 30 of 46 passes for 476 yards – a school record at the time – and threw two touchdowns to Phillip Bobo, who finished with seven receptions for 212 yards. Even after rushing out to a 21-0 lead, the Cougars needed a 22-yard field goal from Aaron Price late in the fourth quarter to seal the program’s third bowl victory.

In 2006, the game had been moved to Tempe and renamed the Insight Bowl when Leach’s seventh Texas Tech team earned a berth and staged the biggest comeback in bowl history. The Red Raiders overcame a 31-point deficit in the third quarter to edge Minnesota 44-41 in overtime, with current USC offensive coordinator and former WSU assistant Graham Harrell nabbing Offensive MVP honors. Antonio Huffman, who was Leach’s longtime Director of Football Operations at WSU, was the defensive MVP and current Cougars interim co-defensive coordinator/cornerbacks coach Darcel McBath had five tackle.

The Cougars, who appeared in the Sun Bowl (2015), the Holiday Bowl (2016, 2017) and the Alamo Bowl (2019), are attempting to finish with a winning record for the fifth consecutive year under Leach with what would be their third postseason victory under the eighth-year coach.

The Falcons are playing in their 10th bowl game under Calhoun, who’s been at the helm since 2007, and have a 4-5 postseason record since the 53-year-old took over.

::::::::::::::::::

Leach: The big problem w/ No. 24 Air Force is stopping them on D

By COUGFANcom

MIKE LEACH DIDN’T sound overly concerned Sunday with how Air Force's ground attack bleeds the clock dry, saying it just means his Air Raid will need to make the most of its possessions. But he did express concern, after Washington State and Air Force were named to play in the Cheez-It Bowl on Dec. 27 in Phoenix, about the Cougar D stopping the No. 3 rushing attack in the land.

“But the biggest thing, and the most difficult thing of all, is you’ve gotta stop Air Force and you know -- that’s a real challenge right there,” said Leach.

WSU ranks 78th nationally in rushing defense, having allowed an average of 170.0 ground yards per game.  Air Force averages 292.5 yards per game on the ground, and has a whopping 686 rushing attempts this season.   The Falcons rank No. 7 nationally in time of possession at 33:43.

Air Force broke into the top 25 last week for the first time since 2010, The Falcons are currently ranked 24th in both polls.

“Other than this bowl game, being an American and everything I always root for Air Force," said Leach.  "But the opportunity to play a great rushing team like them, an option team, I mean, we’re excited about that."

Asked if he’s followed Air Force since his BYU days as a undergrad, when both schools were in the WAC, Leach said he’s always followed AFA.

“If I didn’t throw the ball, I’d run the option -- and why I admire the option is I always felt like our brand of football really kind of started with the wishbone, because what the wishbone always did such a good job of is distribution. All the skill positions touch the ball and it’s pretty good at stretching – they’re great at stretching the field from side to side. And better at stretching it upfield than they’ve ever gotten credit for … So I felt like a lot of our space concepts came from the wishbone,” said Leach.

Troy Calhoun is in his 13th year at Air Force. He said the Falcons will be well represented in Phoenix.

“We might be the away team but at the same time, we’ll have a bunch of people there … “Oh goodness, what a challenge [WSU] is, most certainly. And it’s been that way ever since really, Mike, he’s just done a sensational job even going back at Kentucky, even prior to that … The production, the quality of their execution and really the difficulty in trying to assimilate what they do, it is going to be a gigantic challenge,” said Calhoun.

“We’re thrilled to go to the Cheez-It Bowl and couldn’t be more excited. We couldn’t be more excited and thrilled to play a team the quality of Air Force,” said Leach.



NOTABLE NOTES:

    The Falcons rank No. 52nd in total offense at 423.5 ypg, and 22nd nationally in scoring offense, (34.3).

    The Cougars rank 113th in total defense (456.8 ypg) and 94th in scoring defense, (31.4 ppg).



GAME NOTES:

    WHAT: The Cheez-It Bowl

    WHEN: Friday, Dec. 27

    KICKOFF TIME: 7:15 p.m. Pacific

    THE PAYOUT: $1.04 million per team

    TV: ESPN

    THE SERIES: First meeting Dec. 27

WSU-Air Force in Cheez-It Bowl: Air Raid vs. Ground Calhoun

From Cougfan.com

TWO POLAR OPPOSITES will meet in the Cheez-It Bowl on Dec. 27 in Phoenix, with the Washington State vs. Air Force pairing first reported by ESPN's Kyle Bonagura, followed soon after by the official announcement. If contrasting styles make for great entertainment, this bowl game should be a thriller.  The Cougs own the No. 1 passing offense in the nation, while Air Force boasts the No. 3 rushing offense in the land.

It will be the first time the teams have met, and the first time the Cougars have gone bowling in Arizona since 1992 in the win over Utah when it was called the Copper Bowl.

The Cougars, who finished the regular season fifth in the Pac-12 North, bring a 6-6 overall and 3-6 conference record into the postseason, while the Falcons are 10-2 overall and 7-1 in Mountain West play.

Air Force passes the ball about as often as Mike Leach runs it. AFA ranks 124th out of 130 teams in passing offense (131 ypg) and have attempted only 114 passes all year.  Washington State, having attempted 668 passes this season, ranks 129th in rushing offense (72.5 ypg).

So how does each team’s defense rank against the opponent’s strength?



    WSU ranks 78th in rushing defense.

    AFA ranks 83rd in pass efficiency defense.

Offensively, WSU ranks No. 6 in the land in total offense at 516.8 yards per game, and No. 10 nationally in scoring offense at 39.2 ppg.  Meanwhile, AFA ranks a stout No. 16 in total defense at 315.8, and No. 19 in scoring defense, (19.8).

Defensively, the Cougars rank 113th in total defense (456.8 ypg) and 94th in scoring defense, (31.4 ppg).  The Falcons rank No. 52nd in total offense at 423.5 ypg, and 22nd nationally in scoring offense, (34.3).

This season, Air Force beat Colorado, (30-23 in OT in Week 2).  Its two losses were to Boise State, (30-19), and Navy (34-25).

This will be Washington State's fifth-straight bowl game. Leach is 2-3 in in bowl games at WSU.  Last season, the Cougs beat Iowa State in the Alamo Bowl. In 2017, they lost to Minnesota in the Holiday. In 2016, they lost to Michigan State also in the Holiday. In 2015, WSU defeated Miami in the Sun Bowl, and in 2013, lost to Colorado State in the New Mexico Bowl.

::: WSU Nursing College at 50: From humble beginnings to 21st century care

By Kip Hill Spokane Spokesman-Review 12/8/2019  

They filed two-by-two into the auditorium of historic downtown Riverside Place in Spokane on Thursday evening, joining the ranks of a club that’s a half century in the making.

Some of the graduates of Washington State University’s College of Nursing were drawn to the field by parents or grandparents who were nurses themselves. Others, like Riley Joyce, had a chance encounter with a nurse that sparked a desire to enter the field.

“I was in the hospital for almost four weeks,” said Joyce, who at 15 had complications from surgery and formed a bond with her night-shift nurse during her unexpected stay. “You’re so young, and you’re so embarrassed. She was just so calm about everything.”

The nursing students walking the stage at this fall’s commencement for the school do so on the 50th anniversary of its first class. Initially a partnership between four area colleges, the program has grown from a class of 37 to nearly 650 undergraduates statewide and many more graduate students who will push the profession into the future..

That group now includes Molly Henderson, another fall 2019 graduate who said WSU’s reputation would serve her well trying to find employment in an in-demand field.

“They’re really well known within the hospitals, as well,” Henderson said. “They have a really good relationships with the nurses and the staff because they’ve been here for so long.”

WSU nursing college began in a historic Spokane building with a first-of-its-kind agreement between multiple schools hoping to prepare nurses for a segment of health care primed for change.

Opening in the Carnegie Library on the western edge of downtown Spokane in 1969, the school moved to its $34.6 million headquarters in Spokane’s University District a decade ago, with other campuses in the Tri-Cities, Vancouver, Yakima and Walla Walla.



Much of the job of training students to become nurses has remained the same, with candidates finishing their first two years of undergraduate coursework before applying for a spot at the regional instruction center for their junior and senior years.

 “We do different things in the classroom now, in terms of helping the students learn better so they can pass the national licensing exam at the end of their four years,” said Mel Haberman, who was a student in the nursing college’s first class and now serves as its interim dean.

But the general process of pairing students with mentors and training in the community hasn’t changed, he said. What has changed is the technology available to aid instruction.

Some of the procedures once taught in clinics and hospitals throughout the Inland Northwest are now part of a simulation program, using highly sophisticated mannequins in controlled settings to mimic patient experiences that are rare. The school also is looking to adapt its curriculum to challenge the traditional role of the nurse as a responder to health crises, instead of a partner who can prevent problems before a hospital visit.

The new kids on the block

Haberman was sitting in the offices of Director Hilda Roberts and facing deployment to Vietnam when he first heard about WSU’s bachelor’s program in nursing.

“I went to all of the recruiters in town, and saw that the best they could do for me was to be a combat medic, which I didn’t want to be, since they were the ones killed the most in Vietnam, along with the radiomen,” Haberman said. “I started looking on campus, and heard there was a nursing program.”

As luck would have it, he found out in Roberts’ office on top of the university’s athletic building in Pullman, the deadline for applying for the new program was that same day. Haberman applied, and now, more than 50 years later, he’s the interim dean of the college and a distinguished professor in geriatrics, with a career spent focusing on care for cancer survivors.

Haberman was one in a first class of 37, which included five men. The enrollment allowed him to be in the Army Nurse Program, which required him to serve three years in the branch’s Nurse Corps.

He was stationed in El Paso, Texas, once he’d completed his coursework at what was then known as the Intercollegiate Center for Nursing Education.

It was called that because WSU had partnered with Eastern Washington State College, Whitworth College and Fort Wright College to establish the training center. The colleges were responding to national studies in the mid-1960s indicating the number of nurses with bachelor’s degrees was well behind what would be necessary for instruction of new nurses by the end of the decade.

That prompted the first push for nurses to attain academic degrees beyond the certifications offered at diploma schools in area hospitals, with members of the American Nursing Association in 1965 calling for a minimum bachelor’s degree for all practicing, professional nurses.

“In the nursing field changes have been in the wind for many years but gained impetus in 1965 when the American Nurses’ Association issued a position paper recommending nursing degrees be granted by institutions of higher learning,” Lillian DeYoung, the college’s coordinator of curriculum, told The Spokesman-Review in 1972.

Whitworth, WSU and Gonzaga University had previously established bachelor’s degree programs for nurses, but those programs had been discontinued for various reasons, including funding concerns. That left just the diploma programs run by area hospitals.

Haberman said he remembered performing clinic hours with nurses at Sacred Heart Medical Center in the early 1970s when it was announced the hospital would no longer offer a diploma program.

“The majority of nurses had been graduated from that program,” Haberman said. “So there was some, I think, indirect frustration. We were sort of like, the new kids on the block, and it was awkward to be there the night they announced the program was closing.”

Students still perform those clinical hours, and end their studies with a practicum in which they are paired with a professional nurse for a month ahead of graduation. Chantelle Williams completed her practicum in labor and delivery at Providence Holy Family Hospital in Spokane, a concentration she’d like to enter after her graduation this fall.

“We just basically do their job, while they sit back and watch us and monitor us,” said Williams, who said she’ll be the first in her family to receive a bachelor’s degree and the family’s first nurse. The Kent, Washington, native transferred to WSU after completing her prerequisite courses at San Francisco State University.

There were so few students in the first class that all prospective nurses progressed through the curriculum together. But the program quickly grew, numbering 200 students by 1973, when Sacred Heart’s diploma program graduated its final class. The budget grew from just $44,735 in the first year to $1.5 million a decade later.

The school grew too big for the old library and its gray walls and fireplaces. In 1980, the Magnuson building opened near Spokane Falls Community College and would house the training program for the next 29 years.

Haberman taught for a year at the new building, then left for posts in Western Washington. He returned in 1999, after obtaining master’s and doctorate degrees from the University of Washington, and was named interim dean earlier this year.

It’s not a post he thought he’d occupy all those years ago, sitting in Roberts’ office.

“I sort of followed the wave of advanced education for nurses,” Haberman said.

That wave has been breaking in different ways over the past 10 to 15 years, as the college has moved into a new headquarters on downtown Spokane’s eastern border, while new technology and growing numbers of students have pushed much of the instruction back into the classroom.

‘The door is closed, and they’re in here working as a nurse’

Kevin Stevens’ second-floor laboratory is a corridor of medical devices, hospital beds and lifelike limbs.

But it’s the room at the end of the hallway that is the piece de resistance of her lab.

“When she’s on, you’ll see her blinking,” said Stevens, director of the college’s simulation program, hitting the “on” switch on a $75,000 high-fidelity mannequin wearing a silver-toned wig and spectacles. “You’ll see her chest rise and fall, just like she’s breathing. She’s got heart and lung sounds, just like you and I have them.”

Jesse Tinsley

Heaven forbid one of Stevens’ students refer to the lifelike body in the hospital bed before them as “a dummy.” This highly complicated medical device, attached to a computer controlling behaviors that can include sweating, bleeding and crying out in pain, is now a player in the proving ground for upperclassmen hoping to earn their nursing certification.

Stevens arrived at WSU by way of Fairchild Air Force Base in 2010, and brought with her a dedication to teaching nursing through simulation. Students enter an exam room that mirrors those at any regional hospital and are assigned a series of tasks they must complete, with Stevens or one of her assistants providing real-time feedback.

The method requires buy-in from the students, something Stevens said has grown with time, and also nationwide research that showed up to half of a nurse’s instruction can be achieved through simulation without a hit to test scores.

“The door is closed, and they’re in here working as a nurse,” she said.

The benefits of simulation, which would have been impossible with the technology available when the school opened its doors in the 1960s, is that instructors have control over the types of scenarios students face. They can present nursing candidates with conditions they would be unlikely to see completing clinic hours in area health centers and hospitals, Stevens said, or that new health regulations would prevent them from performing before completing their training.

“It’s focused learning,” Stevens said. “We know that every student that graduates out of our program will have had an opportunity to participate in at least two code scenarios.”

“Code scenarios” is health care-speak for cardiac arrest.

Cassidy Gurich, who can now add “B.S.N.” to the end of her name after graduating this fall, said that simulation exercise prepared her for clinical work when she did see a patient whose heart stopped.

“I learned the more serious you took it, as like a real situation, the more you could learn from it,” said Gurich, whose training helped prepare her to select the proper medicine for her heart attack patient.

“I would have been freaking out, if I didn’t know what to do,” she said.

The other benefit to performing hundreds of hours of simulation on a campus is that the school doesn’t have to go looking for additional clinical partners, which can be hard to find in far-flung areas of Eastern Washington and with high demand from other learning institutions, said Haberman, the interim dean.

“The clinical placements are saturated, because we have so many nursing schools,” he said. “And the online classes that we have, out of Washington state, are enrolling students and all fighting for the same clinical spaces.”

Even so, WSU’s nursing college has students in more than 600 locations performing on-the-job training, he said. The number of potential locations for nursing students at the college totals 2,500, many of them in rural centers that reflect the ongoing commitment to provide care in underserved areas. That commitment was made in the early days of the school.

“I hope the new training will encourage many to go to areas where few health personnel are available but are badly needed,” DeYoung, the school’s curriculum coordinator, told The Spokesman-Review in 1972.

Simulation doesn’t just instruct the technical skills required to become a nurse, Stevens said. Faculty can speak to a student through a microphone and run through sophisticated scripts to deal with a number of health issues, both physical and emotional.

It’s this type of training that will push the nursing profession forward, said Lisa Day, associate dean for academic affairs at the college.

What’s old is new again

For generations, nursing instruction has been focused on preparing students to work in hospitals and deal with the fallout of health crises, Day insists.

“These programs have been sort of stuck in an old way of training by loading up content,” she said. “Putting tubes in, taking tubes out – that’s what we’ve been focusing on.”

The University of California, San Francisco-educated administrator said it’s time to do something new. Or perhaps even older.

“If you look at the further back history of nursing, this is sort of where nursing began, is in public health,” she said. “Really trying to create environments that are healthy for people to live in.”

Instead of placing aspiring nurses in assisted care facilities and hospitals, where they’re dealing with patients who are already experiencing health problems, Day envisions a future in which nursing students instead visit regional health centers and health fairs, interacting with healthy people before they’re at-risk of admission.

“It’s not that we’re saying there’s no place for RNs in hospital environments, because there definitely is and there definitely will continue to be,” Day said. “I think that part of what’s going to shift this focus of health care, is when we shift the focus of our education to help these new nurses to see the possibilities they have outside of hospital-based rescue.”

The idea actually hearkens back to the work of Florence Nightingale, the 19th century British social reformer credited with professionalizing the industry for women in her care for soldiers. After the death of a lower-class laborer in a London workhouse in 1864, Nightingale wrote a report to Parliament calling for changes to the treatment of illness among the city’s working poor, including the creation of a taxpayer-funded medical relief fund for workers.

Day sees the education of modern nurses following in those footsteps, preparing graduates to push for public policy changes and take an active role alongside doctors in developing treatment and prevention plans with patients seeking primary care. That will require a shift, as well, in public perceptions of what nurses do, she said.

“We hear, all the time, that nursing is the most trusted profession,” Day said. “I wonder what that really means, that we’re the most trusted profession. If you read most of what’s published in the popular press, it refers to doctors, MDs.”

Some of that work is already occurring. Taylor Bye, a 2019 graduate of the school, said his clinical experience included work with the Spokane Fire Department and their Community Assistance Response, or CARES, Team. That group visits frequent 911 callers who are experiencing chronic medical conditions and have no insurance to cover traditional care.

“It was a really good experience,” said Bye. “Those are more about preventing emergencies. It’s like, you’re trying to limit as many medical emergencies as you can.”

Day pointed to other nursing schools, including regional players like Seattle University and the University of Washington, as already adopting this type of instruction early in the curriculum. That includes education on things like motivational interviewing, which allows nurses to work with patients in determining potential health problems, rather than simply putting on a blood pressure cuff and writing down vital-sign observations.

This curriculum reform is intended to continue to push the WSU nursing college’s instruction into the next 50 years, just as the decision in the 1960s to provide an in-demand academic degree for the profession spurred the creation of the school in the first place.

“I don’t recall any discussion that they thought this program was going to fail,” said Haberman, reflecting on his early years when the faculty numbered fewer than a dozen and accreditation wasn’t a certainty. “It wasn’t an experiment.”

Fifty years on, the legacy created from that initial program allows students like Gurich, who will also be the first nurse in her family after idolizing one who cared for her ailing grandfather, to pass that care on to a new generation of patients.

“Honestly, it’s been such a long journey, and I never thought I’d actually be a nurse,” she said. “It’s a dream come true.”



#